![top php for mac top php for mac](https://hative.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/python-ides/pythontoolkit-11.png)
The present AutoHotkey C++ interpreter, installer, etc.
Top php for mac windows#
Though let's keep in mind that the Windows OS still holds a huge user base.
Top php for mac code#
And because they are so Windows centric, this can result in development choices that makes the AutoHotkey source code even harder to port over to a different OS. WINE has been discussed a number of times on the forums, example- (AHK installer under Linux/WINE).įrom that forum post about the installer, what we are getting is that the present AutoHotkey developers are very Windows centric and lack any motivation to create a cross-platform version of AutoHotkey.
Top php for mac software#
Open-source software that provides a Windows runtime enviornment for running applications on Linux and Macs. However, to make this a bit more complicated, there is WINE ( (software). Usually the issues presented about AutoHotkey being on a different OS has been the Windows APIs and Dlls, where the code needs to be different for that OS. The thinking that AutoHotkey code must be married to C++ and Windows, instead of thinking of AutoHotkey as it's own language that could use other interpreters, written in other programming languages. I think the other part of the issue is mindset. C#, Object Pascal, or Red would be good cross-platform candidates as well. I don't know how well Lua works out as a cross-platform language. It's interesting that this isn't being done for AutoHotkey. Many other programming languages make use of such. That sounds like a Transpiler or Source-to-Source Compiler.
Top php for mac mac os#
For instance have Lua "interpret" the AHK code by reading regular AHK code and then tranforming it into something Mac OS can understand. I've heard you can do this by translating AHK via another common language, such as Lua. Some other processes, such as our shared composer and yarn cache could benefit from Docker’s cached option - programs are persisting data, so in this case it might be more important that writes are perfectly replicated to the host.Is it possible to run the same AHK code written for Windows on a Mac by using a different software (e.g. Data is only changing when I hit save, and it’s already been replicated via delegated by the time I’ve got a chance to react. I personally default to delegated, as generally our bind-mounted volumes contain source code. However, certain workloads could require increased consistency. The file system delays between the host and the container aren’t perceived by humans. There may be delays until updates within the container appear on the host. There may be delays before writes on a host are available to the container. Every time a write happens, the data is flushed to all participants of the mount’s view. The host and container are perfectly consistent. We can allow for some slight delays, and temporary discrepancies in exchange for greatly increased performance. Docker defaults to a consistent guarantee that the host and containers file system reflect each other.įor the majority of our use cases at Engage we don’t actually need a consistent reflection - perfect consistency between container and host is often unnecessary. One of the biggest performance optimisations you can make, is altering the guarantee that file system data is perfectly replicated to the host and container. We’ve identified bind-mounts can be slow on Mac ( see above).
![top php for mac top php for mac](https://static3.makeuseofimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/HTML-Effects-Featured.jpg)
However, unlike Docker on Linux, any file system changes need to be passed between the host and container via Docker for Mac, which can soon add a lot of additional computational overhead. HyperKit provides the kernel capabilities of Linux. This is a native MacOS application, which is bundled with an embedded hypervisor ( HyperKit). In contrast, there is a much bigger overhead on MacOS and other platforms in keeping the file system consistent - which leads to a performance degradation.ĭocker containers run on top of a Linux kernel meaning Docker on Linux can utilise the native kernel and the underlying virtual file system is shared between the host and container. On Linux, keeping a consistent guaranteed view between the host and container has very little overhead. Any writes in either the host or container are then reflected vice-versa.
![top php for mac top php for mac](https://d1od8ja1ziybcd.cloudfront.net/wp-content/content/2018/10/codelobster-css-editor.jpg)
It gives the container a view of the host’s file system - In literal terms, pointing a particular directory in the container to a directory on your Mac. In Docker, we can bind-mount a volume on the host (your mac), to a Docker container.